Assaulting a Peace Officer
Assaulting a peace officer is a serious crime in Canada, and sentences reflect this to deter others and may result in jail time.
Jump to section
Plain-Language Summary
Assaulting a Peace Officer: Peace officers are the frontline of our justice system, responsible for responding to crime and keeping the public safe. All police officers are peace officers, but not all peace officers are police officers. It is for that reason that assaults against a peace officer are taken seriously. The law demands that sentences reflect the seriousness of the crime to deter others from committing such offences and jail terms are often imposed.
Assaulting a Peace Officer
Assaulting a peace officerPeople involved in upholding justice can result in a prison sentence ranging from up to five years (for the basic offence) to up to 14 years (for the most serious form — aggravated assault of a peace officer under s.270.02), depending on how the charge is laid and what happened. Because assaulting a peace officer commonly involves using violence against a public servant or public official, you can expect the Crown to seek a jail sentence if convicted.
The charge of assaulting a peace officer, covered under s.270 (1) of the Criminal Code, is not confined to those who work in policing. The law also protects Corrections Canada prison guards, sheriffs, duty sheriffs, sheriff's officers, fish and game officers, bylaw officers, justices of the peace, court bailiffs, members of the Canadian Forces, customs agents, pilots in command of aircraft and public officials such as mayors, wardens and reeves.
It is important to remember the seriousness of the offence, the degree of injury and the use of a weapon will significantly impact your sentence if you are convicted.
If you assaulted a peace officer while carrying, using or threatening to use a weapon, you could be charged with assaulting a peace officer with a weapon. If the incident caused injury to the officer, you might face the charge of assaulting a peace officer, causing bodily harm. You can also be charged with aggravated assault of a peace officer if the alleged incident results in wounding, maiming, disfigurement or endangerment to the victim's life.
Three Types of Assaulting a Peace Officer
Assault in the line of duty
If you assault a peace officer in the performance of their job or if you assault a person who is helping that officer carry out their duties you could face criminal charges. The Crown must prove you were aware the victim was not only a peace officer but that they were acting in an official capacity.
Resisting arrest
You can face charges if you use force to resist arrest or if you assault a person in an attempt to prevent a peace officer from making a lawful arrest or detaining someone else. An arrest can be made by a peace officer or a private citizen. It is worth noting that even if you are arrested in error and resist arrest, you may still be charged.
Preventing the execution of duty
This provision protects those who are attempting to enforce a civil law matter, such as an eviction. If you assault someone engaged in the lawful execution of a seizure of lands or goods, you could face assaulting a peace officer charges. You can also be criminally charged if an assault occurs when you are trying to reclaim something that has been seized.
What is Needed to Convict
To be convicted of assaulting a peace officer, the Crown must prove its case beyond a reasonable doubtThe high standard the Crown must meet to prove guilt., the standard for any criminal conviction before the court. It should be noted that this charge has often been disputed by defendants who claim it was only laid after police used undue force during their arrest.
There are three elements that must be established for a conviction.
- First, the Crown must prove you intentionally used non-consensual force on the officer.
- It must also be proven that you knew the alleged victim was a peace officer.
- You must also know the officer was acting in the lawful execution of their duties.
A defence lawyer may argue that police have exceeded their powers and your rights under the Canadian Charter of Rights and Freedoms. You have the right to be free from unreasonable police searches. You have the right to know when you are being arrested. You have the right to a lawyer. These rights can impact your case.
Treated as a Summary or Indictable Offence
Assaulting a peace officer is a hybrid offence. The maximum is 5 years if prosecuted by indictment. On summary conviction, the general maximum is a $5,000 fine, imprisonment for two years less a day, or both.
The Crown will often request a jail sentence if you have been convicted to show public respect for law enforcement and to act as a deterrent to others.
Penalties for Assaulting a Peace Officer
There are no mandatory minimums for assaulting a police officer with a maximum prison term of five years for an indictable offence or two years less a day for a summary conviction. Under the Criminal Code, those convicted of assault with a weapon face up to 10 years in prison, Aggravated assault carries a term not to exceed 14 years. Other penalties for assaulting a police officer include a 10-year weapons ban and you may be required to submit DNA to the National Database. In addition, if you are convicted your record will be entered into most police and customs officer databases in Canada and the United States.
Of course, each case is based on the facts and other aspects such as a past criminal record will be considered on conviction and sentencing.
Possible Penalties
These are maximum sentences. Actual sentences depend on the facts, criminal history, and any mitigating or aggravating circumstances.
Assaulting a peace officer — s. 270
HybridSection 270 sets no summary-conviction maximum of its own, so the general s. 787 default applies: a fine of up to $5,000, imprisonment of up to two years less a day, or both. The section also covers assaulting a public officer, assaulting any person with intent to resist or prevent a lawful arrest or detention of oneself or another (s. 270(1)(b)), and assaulting a person engaged in the lawful execution of a process, distress or seizure (s. 270(1)(c)). No mandatory minimum.
With a weapon or causing bodily harm — s. 270.01
HybridApplies where, in committing an assault referred to in s. 270, the person carries, uses or threatens to use a weapon (or an imitation of one) or causes bodily harm to the complainant. Section 270.01 sets no summary-conviction maximum of its own (the former 18-month summary maximum was removed by Bill C-75, 2019, c. 25, s. 95), so the general s. 787 default applies: a fine of up to $5,000, imprisonment of up to two years less a day, or both. No mandatory minimum.
Aggravated assault of a peace officer — s. 270.02
IndictableApplies where, in committing an assault referred to in s. 270, the person wounds, maims, disfigures or endangers the life of the complainant. No mandatory minimum.
What these words mean
- Indictable
- The more serious way to prosecute an offence. It can carry higher maximum penalties.
- Summary conviction
- The less serious, usually faster way to prosecute an offence, with lower maximum penalties.
- Hybrid
- An offence the Crown can prosecute either way — by indictment or by summary conviction.
- Summary only
- Summary-only offences are prosecuted by summary conviction. The Criminal Code sets the maximum penalty in the specific offence section.
- Crown election
- The Crown prosecutor’s choice of which way to proceed on a hybrid offence.
Possible Defences and Legal Issues
Assaulting a Peace Officer — s.270
Sections 270, 270.01, and 270.02 do not list a special defence in their own wording. The Crown still has to prove that an assault happened, that the person assaulted was a peace officer, public officer, or a person acting in aid of one (or, for the branch involving a lawful process, distress, or seizure, a person engaged in or protecting that process), and that the officer or other protected person was acting in the course of their duty or lawful authority. Depending on the branch charged, the Crown may also need to prove an intent to resist or prevent a lawful arrest or detention.
Assault itself is defined in section 265, and that definition “applies to all forms of assault”, including this offence. Section 265(3) says that “no consent is obtained where the complainant submits or does not resist by reason of” the application of force, threats or fear of force, fraud, or the exercise of authority. This means that consent given only because of one of those things does not count as a defence.
Section 265(4) deals with cases where the accused says they believed the complainant consented. A judge will only put that belief to the jury if satisfied there is enough evidence that, if believed, “the evidence would constitute a defence”. Where that threshold is met, the judge must instruct the jury, in weighing the honesty of the belief, to consider “the presence or absence of reasonable grounds for that belief”. This is a rule about how the belief is assessed, not a guarantee that it will succeed.
Possible issues may still depend on the facts, the evidence, and whether the Crown can prove each part of the offence, including whether the officer or other protected person was acting lawfully. This is general legal information, not legal advice.
Common Legal Terms
Terms marked with a dotted underline in the article above are defined here and available in the full site glossary.
- Beyond a reasonable doubt Glossary entry →
- The high standard the Crown must meet to prove guilt.
Legal sources
The official statute section(s) this page is based on. Always confirm against the official source before relying on it.
-
Criminal Code s. 270 Main offenceLast reviewed by CCH: 2026-07-05View official source ↗
-
Criminal Code s. 270.01 Main offence (with weapon or causing bodily harm)Source current to: 2026-05-26View official source ↗
-
Criminal Code s. 270.02 Main offence (aggravated assault of peace officer)Source current to: 2026-05-26View official source ↗
-
Criminal Code s. 265 Definition (assault)Source current to: 2026-05-26View official source ↗
-
Criminal Code s. 2 Definition ("peace officer" and "public officer")Source current to: 2026-05-26View official source ↗
-
Criminal Code s. 718.02 Sentencing factor (denunciation and deterrence given primary consideration)Source current to: 2026-05-26View official source ↗
-
Criminal Code s. 270.03 Sentencing factor (sentence served consecutively — offence against a law enfo...Source current to: 2026-05-26View official source ↗
-
Criminal Code s. 787 General penalty (summary conviction default)Source current to: 2026-05-26View official source ↗
Government References
Find a Criminal Defence Lawyer Near You
If you or someone you know is facing criminal charges, a criminal defence lawyer can review the situation and explain the options.
Search the Lawyer DirectoryCriminal Code Help does not endorse or recommend specific lawyers.
Report an inaccuracy or concern about this page
Report an inaccuracy or concern about this page
Report: Assaulting a Peace Officer
Use this form to report a possible error, outdated information, unclear wording, broken link, or other concern about this page.
General legal information only. Not legal advice. We do our best to keep this page accurate and up to date, but criminal law can change and every case depends on its facts. Check the review date and consult the Criminal Code or a criminal defence lawyer before relying on this information.
About this page
Criminal Code Help explains selected Criminal Code offences and related legal concepts in plain language. The goal is to help readers understand the general meaning of the law without having to read the full statutory text.
This page is a simplified summary. It does not include every exception, definition, court interpretation, evidentiary issue, Charter issue, sentencing factor, or procedural rule that may apply in a real case.
Legal information, not legal advice
This page is general legal information only. It is not legal advice and should not be relied on as advice about any specific charge, investigation, court file, or personal situation.
Possible defences and legal issues depend on the facts, the evidence, the exact charge, current Canadian law, and the province or territory where the case is being handled. If you are facing a criminal charge or researching a real legal problem, speak with a criminal defence lawyer in your province or territory.